DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
DIC
Docket No. NR11914-14
28 Apr 15
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
27 April 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You
petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records seeking the
following: change block 17c (date of entry) to reflect August 1968
vice 15 September 1969. You did not, however, provide any information
and/or evidence that would support the Board granting some level of
relief. A review of our files revealed the following: DD Form 4
(Enlistment contract - Armed Forces of the United States); date of
enlistment/induction, date military obligation incur, date of
transfer, date of rate/grade, active duty base date, and pay entry
base date all reflect 15 September 1969. Furthermore, NAVMC 118 (23)
(record of service) reflects 15 September 1969, and NAVMC 118 (9)
(combat history, expeditions, and awards) National Defense Service
Medal was issued effective 15 September 1969. However, armed forces
security questioner and "statement of understanding of military
obligations assumed by me upon my enlistment in the Marine Corps or
marine Corps Reserve" reflect 1 July 1969. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of
the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
Docket No. Nr11914-14
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Singeyely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06460-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps undated, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02448-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A minimum average conduct mark of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07349-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 15 June 2006, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05415-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00630-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04571-02
application with supporting 118(11) page 11 MC0 P1070.12K, Marine Corps Individual Records 2. This entry does state that First Lieutenant b. 2 Subj: CASE OF FIRST LIEUTENANT SMCR d. The fact that the page 11 entry does not contain the two the validity of the page 11 could be "recommendations for corrective action and where However, paragraph 1100.2 of the Marine Corps Manual the special trust and confidence, in officers by their commission, a elements, assistance is available", mitigated.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03690-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 9 May 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06138-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2O37O-5100 CRSDocket No: 6138-0621 September 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board f or Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08064-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 31 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03872-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 11 July 2002, a copy of which is attached. application with supporting 118(11) MC0 (IRAM), authorizes commanders to make P1070.12K, Marine Corps Individual Records 2. s claim that the page 11 unjust because the contents of counseling, did occur The event, d. Lance Corpora page 11 entry in her provide any other supporting documented evidence to support her request for removal of the page 11 entry.